Applying CLIL to English language teaching in Thailand: Issues and challenges

Khwanchit Suwannoppharat, Sumalee Chinokul

Abstract


Most countries in the world have been influenced by the trends of globalization and interculturality; accordingly, the English language and related cultures have come to play more important roles in global communication. Educational research, a primary source for language teaching and learning development, has increasingly emphasized the importance of integrating language and culture in teaching and learning processes. However, it is not easy for students who use English as a foreign language (EFL) to speak English fluently in an environment where English is rarely used outside the classroom. Teachers nevertheless try to find out the most appropriate teaching approach to develop their students’ English skills in order to serve the demands for English in the labor markets. This article discusses the application of CLIL in an EFL context—a case study in Thailand—with an emphasis on explanation of CLIL framework and principles and how these are implemented in Thailand as guidelines for developing EFL courses or curriculum. Both advantages and disadvantages of applying CLIL are examined and the difficulties of applying CLIL in the classroom are clarified to help EFL teachers plan their courses more effectively.

Key words: Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL), English communication, language teaching and learning, EFL context


Full Text:

PDF

References


Association of Southeast Asian Nations. (2009). Roadmap for ASEAN community. Bangkok, Thailand: ASEAN.

British Council. 2006. Future perfect-English language policy for global transition conference report. Retrieved from the British Council Thailand website: http://my.britishcouncil.or.th/upload/future-perfect/statement-of-conference-outcomes.pdf

Bruton, A. (2011). Is CLIL so beneficial, or just selective? Re-evaluating some of the research. System, 39(4), 523–532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.08.002

Cendoya, A. M., & Di Bin, M. V. (2010). A CLIL experience based on the use of tasks and different genre types. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 3(1), 11–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2010.3.1.2

Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D. (2013). Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 243–262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt011

Costa, F. (2009). ICLHE/CLIL at the tertiary level of education. Studies about Languages, 15, 85-88.

Coyle, D. (2011, April). Teacher education and CLIL methods and tools. Unpublished seminar presented in Milan, Italy. Retrieved from http://www.cremit.it/public/documenti/seminar.pdf

Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content-and-language integrated learning: From practice to principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000092

Dalton-Puffer, C., Llinares, A., Lorenzo, F., & Nikula, T. (2014). “You can stand under my umbrella”: Immersion, CLIL and bilingual education: A response to Cenoz, Genesee & Gorter (2013). Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 213–218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu010

Dalton-Puffer, C., Nikula, T., & Smit, U. (2010). Charting policies, premises and research on content and language integrated learning. In C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smit (Eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms (pp. 1-22). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Benjamins.

Dalton-Puffer, C., & Smit, U. (2007). Empirical perspectives on CLIL classroom discourse. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Lang.

Darn, Steve. (2006). Content and language integrated learning. Retrieved from the British Council/TeachingEnglish website: https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/content-language-integrated-learning

Dhanasobhon, S. (2006). English language teaching dilemma in Thailand. Retrieved from the ACIT website: http://www.curriculumandinstruction.org/index.php?lay=show&ac=article&Id=539134523&Ntype=7

Duenas, M. (2004). The whats, whys, hows and whos of content-based instruction in second and foreign language education. International Journal of English Studies, 4(1), 73-96.

Education First. (2013). EF English proficiency index. Retrieved from the Education First website: http://www.ef.de/__/~/media/centralefcom/epi/v4/downloads/full-reports/ef-epi-2014-english.pdf

Elhoseiny, A. S. (2008, March). Content-based instruction & its application to Arabic English classroom. Unpublished paper presented at the ISNA Education Forum, Chicago, IL.

Eurydice. (2006). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) at school in Europe. Brussels, Belgium: Eurydice European Unit. Retrieved from http://www.indire.it/lucabas/lkmw_file/eurydice/CLIL_EN.pdf

Garrido, M. F. L. (2000). CLIL: A new approach to TEFL. Unpublished manuscript retrieved from http://www.lara25.com/mywebdisk/NA-TEFL/NA-assignment.pdf

Graddol, D. (2006). English next: Why global English may mean the end of “English as a foreign language”. London, UK: British Council. Retrieved from http://www.britishcouncil.org/learning-research-english-next.pdf

Hirvela, A. (2011). Writing to learn in content areas: Research insights. In R. M. Manchon (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 37-60). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Benjamins.

Jappinen, A. K. (2005). Thinking and content learning of mathematics and science as cognitional development in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Teaching through a foreign language in Finland. Language and Education, 19(2), 148-169.

Klimova, B. F. (2012). CLIL and the teaching of foreign languages. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 572–576. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.698

Lasagabaster, D. (2008). Foreign language competence in Content and Language Integrated courses. The Open Applied Linguistics Journal, 1, 31-42.

Lawson, L. (2002). Scaffolding as a teaching strategy. Unpublished manuscript retrieved from http://www.ode.state.or.us/opportunities/grants/nclb/title_iii/2scaffolding-as-a-teaching-strategy.pdf

MacKenzie, A. S. (2008). CLILing me softly in Thailand: Collaboration, creativity and conflict. Retrieved from the One Stop English website: http://www.onestopenglish.com/clil/clil-teacher-magazine/your-perspectives/cliling-me-softly-in-thailand-collaboration-creativity-and-conflict/500927.article

Marsh, D. (2000). An introduction to CLIL for parents and young people. In D. Marsh & G. Lange (Eds.), Using languages to learn and learning to use languages. Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä.

Marsh, D. (2002). CLIL/EMILE - The European dimension: Actions, trends and foresight potential. Jyväskylä, Finland: UniCOM, Continuing Education Centre, University of Jyväskylä. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/education/languages/pdf/doc491_en.pdf

Marsh, D. (2009). CLIL: An interview with Professor David Marsh. A. G. Scott (Ed.) IH Journal of Education and Development, 29. Retrieved from http://ihjournal.com/content-and-language-integrated-learning

Marsh, D., Maljers, A., & Hartiala, A.-K. (2001). Profiling European CLIL classrooms: Languages open doors. Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskyla. Retrieved from http://lakk.bildung.hessen.de/netzwerk/faecher/bilingual/Magazin/mat_aufsaetze/clilprofiling.pdf

Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols-Martín, M. J. (2008). Uncovering CLIL: Content and language integrated learning in bilingual and multilingual education. Oxford, UK: Macmillan Education.

Morton, T. (2010). Using a genre-based approach to integrating content and language in CLIL. In C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula & U. Smit (Eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms (pp. 81-104). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Benjamins.

National Institute of Educational Testing Service. (2015). O-Net test results. Retrieved from http://www.dailynews.co.th/Content/education/308764/%E0%B8%84%E0%B8%B0%E0%B9%81%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%99%E0%B9%82%E0%B8%AD%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%99%E0%B9%87%E0%B8%95+%E0%B8%A1.+6+%E0%B8%95%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%B3%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%AB%E0%B8%A1%E0%B8%B7%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%99%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%94%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%A1

Nikula, T. (2010). Effects of CLIL on a teacher's language use. In C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula & U. Smit (Eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classroom (pp. 105-124). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Benjamins.

Noom-ura, S. (2013). English-teaching problems in Thailand and Thai teachers’ professional development needs. English Language Teaching, 6(11), 139-147.

Noopong, D. (2002). English teaching problems and the needs for professional development of teachers of English in education extended schools under the jurisdiction of the Office of Primary Education. Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.

Nowak, S. (2011, July). The need for content and language integrated learning (CLIL) development. Paper presented at the 4th International ALTE Conference: Impact of Language Frameworks on Assessment, Learning and Teaching: Policies, Procedures and Challenges, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.

Phoodokmai, B. (2011). Development of an English for Academic Purposes course using Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) to enhance reading and writing skills of students at Udon Thani Rajabhat University (Unpublished Master’s degree). Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Prasongporn, P. (2009, June). CLIL in Thailand: Challenges and possibilities. Unpublished paper presented at the Access English EBE Symposium, Jakarta, Indonesia.

Richards, J. C., & Rogers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd Ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Samawathdana, R. (2010). Development of a health study instructional model using English as a medium based on Experiential Learning Theory and Content and Language Integrated Learning approach to enhance health behavior and English communication ability of lower secondary school students (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation). Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Vilkancience, L. (2011). CLIL in tertiary education: Does it have anything to offer? Studies about Languages, 18, 111-118.

Wolff, D. (2007). CLIL: Bridging the gap between school and working life. In D. Marsh & D. Wolff (Eds.), Diverse contexts-converging goals: CLIL in Europe. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Lang.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.






This journal and its papers are published with the Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). You are free to share copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format if you: give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made; don’t use our material for commercial purposes; don’t remix, transform, or build upon the material.

Indexed in: DOAJLinguistics Abstracts Online,Google ScholarsMLA Bibliography - Language, Linguistics and LiteratureOpen J-Gate,Directory of Research Journals Indexing, EBSCOProQueste-Revist@sPublindexERICEmerging Sources Citation IndexORE (Open-Access Research in English Language Teaching)Cabell's International (The White List)Red Iberoamericana de Innovación y Conocimiento Científico (Redib)

Email: laclil@unisabana.edu.co