How Effective is the Assessment Component of a Customized CLIL Program?
Keywords:Content and language integrated learning, assessment, learner attitude, teacher attitude, teacher training.
Considering the pivotal role of assessment, this study aimed to investigate the attitudes of the students and the teachers towards the assessment component of a customized content and language integrated learning in an English as a foreign language program implemented at the tertiary level in Turkey. It also sought to study its effectiveness as a tool for the integrated assessment of language and content. Data were obtained by a mixed-method research approach from 525 university freshman students and 17 English language teachers via questionnaires and follow-up interviews with the teachers and the students. The results indicated that both the students and the teachers developed positive attitudes towards the assessment component of content and language integrated learning. The assessment component was also found to be an adequate tool for the integrated assessment of content and language.
To reference this article (APA) / Para citar este artículo (APA) / Para citar este artigo (APA)
Isık, A. (2020). How effective is the assessment component of a customized CLIL program? Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 13(2), 241-287. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2020.13.2.5
AECLIL. (2013). Assessment and evaluation in CLIL. https://aeclil.altervista.org/Sito/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/AECLIL-Assessment-and-evaluation-in-CLIL.pdf
Barbero, T. (2012). Assessment tools and practices in CLIL. In F. Quartapelle (Ed.), Assessment and Evaluation in CLIL (pp. 38–56). European Commission: AECLIL-EACEA. https://aeclil.altervista.org/Sito/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/AECLIL-Assessment-and-evaluation-in-CLIL.pdf
Barrios, E., & Milla-Lara, M. D. (2018). CLIL methodology, materials and resources, and assessment in a monolingual context: An analysis of stakeholders’ perceptions in Andalusia. The Language Learning Journal, 48(1), 60–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2018.1544269
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press.
Douglas, D. (2010). Understanding language testing. Hoddler Education.
Inbar-Lourie, O. (2008). Constructing a language assessment knowledge base: A focus on language assessment courses. Language Testing, 25(3), 385–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532208090158
Isik, A. (2003). Is ESP a success in the Turkish EFL context? ITL Review of Applied Linguistics, 141(1), 255–287. https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.141.0.2003190
Isik, A. (2008). Linguistic imperialism and foreign language teaching. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 5(1), 123–144. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ali_Isik6/publication/323958594_Linguistic_Imperialism_and_Foreign_Language_Teaching/links/5ab4afecaca27217100444e1/Linguistic-Imperialism-and-Foreign-Language-Teaching.pdf
Leal, J. P. (2016). Assessment in CLIL: Test development at content and language for teaching natural science in English as a foreign language. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 9(2), 293–317. http://dx.doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2016.9.2.3
LICI. (2009). Language in content instruction. http://lici.utu.fi.
Linfield, K. J., & Posavac, E. J. (2018). Program evaluation: Methods and case studies. Routledge.
Lo, Y. Y., & Fung, D. (2018). Assessments in CLIL: The interplay between cognitive and linguistic demands and their progression in secondary education. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1436519
Maggi, F. (2012). Evaluation in CLIL. In F. Quartapelle (Ed.), Assessment and Evaluation in CLIL (pp. 57–74). http://aeclil.altervista.org/Sito/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/AECLIL-Assessment-and-evaluation-in-CLIL.pdf
Massler, U. (2010). Assessment in CLIL learning. In S. Ioannou-Georgiou &
P. Pavlou (Eds.), Guidelines for CLIL implementation in primary and pre-primary education (pp. 114–136). Cyprus Pedagogical Institute.
Massler, U., Stotz, D., & Queisser, C. (2014). Assessment instruments for primary CLIL: The conceptualisation and evaluation of test tasks. The Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.891371
Morgan, C. (2006). Appropriate language assessment in content and language integrated learning. Language Learning Journal, 33(1), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730685200121
O’Dwyer, F., & De Boer, M. (2015). Approaches to assessment in CLIL classrooms: Two case studies. Language Learning in Higher Education, 5(2), 397–421. https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2015-0019
Otto, A. (2017). Assessment issues in CLIL: What you’ve been wondering but were afraid to ask. Revista de Investigación, (1), 1–13. https://app.rdim.es/archivos/publicacion/303dce018b15282742f1b7545667f026.pdf
Otto, A. (2018). Assessing language in CLIL: A review of the literature towards a functional model. LACLIL, 11(2), 308–325. http://dx.doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2018.11.2.6
Peña, I. P. (2017). Assessment for learning in primary CLIL classrooms and its co-construction in classroom discourse (Doctoral dissertation). Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c0b9/660532606c95161d635d2163b22824eb2ea4.pdf
Purpura, J. E. (2016). Second and foreign language assessment. The Modern Language Journal, 100, 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12308
Reierstam, H. (2015). Assessing language or content? A comparative study of the assessment practices in three Swedish upper secondary CLIL schools (Licentiate thesis). University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. https://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/40701/4/gupea_2077_40701_4.pdf
Serragiotto, G. (2007). Assessment and evaluation in CLIL. In D. Marsh & D. Wolff (Eds). Diverse contexts – Converging goals. CLIL in Europe
(pp. 271–283). Peter Lang.
Short, D. J. (1993). Assessing integrated language and content instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 27(4), 627–656. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587399
Tedick, D., & Cammarata, L. (2006). Integrated performance assessment: Adapting the model for CBI. Minneapolis: Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition (CARLA). https://www.carla.umn.edu/cobaltt/modules/assessment/ipa/index.html
Tsagari, D. (Ed.). (2016). Classroom-based Assessment in L2 Contexts. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Tsagari, D., & Vogt, K. (2017). Assessment literacy of foreign language teachers around Europe: Research, challenges and future prospects. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 6(1), 41–63. https://arts.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/2349928/6_1_SI3TsagariVogt.pdf
Vogt, K., & Tsagari, D. (2014). Assessment literacy of foreign language teachers: Findings of a European study. Language Assessment Quarterly, 11(4), 374–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2014.960046
Wewer, T. (2014). Assessment of young learners’ English proficiency in bilingual content instruction CLIL (Doctoral dissertation). The University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Xavier, A. (2016). Assessment for learning in EBE/CLIL: A learning-oriented approach to assessing English language skills and curriculum content at early primary level (Doctoral dissertation). Nova University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal. https://run.unl.pt/bitstream/10362/17973/1/ProjectWork_ELT_AX_OE_FINAL_28_10_2015.pdf
Zafiri, M., & Zouganeli, K. (2017). Toward an understanding of Content and Language Integrated Learning Assessment (CLILA) in primary school classes: A case study. Research Papers in Language Teaching and Learning, 8(1), 88–109. https://rpltl.eap.gr/images/2017/08-01-088-Zafiri-Zouganeli.pdf
Zhetpisbayeva, B. A., Kitibayeva, A. K, Kazimova, D. A., Akbayeva, G. N., & Zatyneiko, M. A. (2018). Assessment issues in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL). Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Education & Research, 8(4), 32–38. https://japer.in/storage/models/article/JOBbrVa32ILzNvUY8Vj3Ysq9Op4YlJdySeGkY2nS9B04dAgB6Nxw5kO3QsfQ/assessment-issues-in-content-and-language-integrated-learning-clil.pdf
Copyright (c) 2020 Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
This journal and its papers are published with the Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). You are free to share copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format if you: give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made; don’t use our material for commercial purposes; don’t remix, transform, or build upon the material.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).