CLIL Curriculum Implementation in Higher Education: Constructing Processes of CLIL Teacher Identity

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2023.16.1.2

Keywords:

CLIL curriculum implementation, social-practice theory, content-language integrated learning, teacher agency transformation

Abstract

This study responds to the curricular innovation trends in higher education (HE), which is gradually leaning toward content and language-integrated learning (CLIL) pedagogy. This study features CLIL curriculum implementation from the bottom-up perspective in HE institutions in the Japanese context by focusing on language lecturers’ transformation into CLIL practitioners within a university language center. The qualitative study contemplates lecturers’ ideological dispositions, attitudes, and concerns toward the transition to CLIL pedagogy along with the language center’s overarching external and internal contextual factors and teaching and learning practices as a workgroup. It applies the teaching and learning regimes theory (TLR) to synthesize enhancement implications for the institutions undergoing similar curricular reforms in the form of increasing ­lecturers’ ownership and feeling of belonging. The data collected through semi-structured ­interviews revealed congruence between the ideological underpinnings of the lecturers and the CLIL curricular objectives. TLR theory, which distinguishes the practices of the workgroup for comprehending the change mechanisms, is employed to emphasize the insufficiency of philosophical compatibility on the teachers’ subjective level and the criticality of pragmatic enhancement initiatives to increase salience and profitability as a mandatory condition for maintaining the sustainability of the innovation. This study appeals to department administrators, teachers’ educators, and future CLIL practitioners and contains valuable insights into the normalization of CLIL practices in multiple higher education contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barrios, E., & Milla Lara, M. D. (2020). CLIL methodology, materials and resources, and assessment in a monolingual context: An analysis of stakeholders’ perceptions in Andalusia. The Language Learning Journal, 48, 60-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2018.1544269

Brannick, T., & Coghlan, D. (2007). In defense of being “native”: The case for insider academic research. Organizational research methods, 10(1),

pp. 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106289253

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications Ltd.

Bradford, A. (2020). Internationalizing Japan’s undergraduate education through English medium instruction. In Dimova, S., Kling, J. (eds) Integrating content and language in multilingual universities. Educational linguistics, vol 44 (pp. 53-74). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46947-4_4

Brotherhood, T., Hammond, C. D. & Kim, Y. (2020). Towards an actor-centered typology of internationalization: a study of junior international faculty in Japanese universities. High Educ 79, 497-514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00420-5

Creswell, J. W. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design (international student edition): Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications Ltd.

Czura, A., & Papaja, K. (2013). Curricular models of CLIL education in ­Poland. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16, 321-333. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.777388

Dale, L., Oostdam, R., & Verspoor, M. (2018). Searching for identity and focus: towards an analytical framework for language teachers in bilingual education. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(3), 366-383. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1383351

Deem, & Lucas, L. (2008). Research and teaching cultures in two contrasting UK policy contexts: Academic life in education departments in five English and Scottish universities. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 54(1), 115-133.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-006-9010-z

EF. (2017). EF English proficiency index. http://www.ef-australia.com.au/epi/

Fraser, M. (2011). Exploring the nature and process of professional identity of teachers of English in Japanese higher education [Doctoral dissertation, University of Wollongong, Australia]. https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/3431/

Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Polity Press.

Gkonou, C., Dewaele, J. M., & King, J. (Eds.). (2020). The emotional rollercoaster of language teaching. Multilingual Matters & Channel View Publications. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788928342

Green, D. (2019). Foreign faculty in Japan. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(3), 523-526. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909651900043X

Hashimoto, K., Glasgow, G.P. (2019). CLIL for who? Commodification of English-medium courses in Japan’s higher education. In: Liyanage, I., Walker, T. (eds) Multilingual education yearbook 2019. Multilingual education yearbook (pp. 103-119). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14386-2_6

Times Higher Education. Rikkyo University. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/rikkyo-university

Ministry of Education of Japan. About. https://tgu.mext.go.jp/en/about/index.html

Ikeda, M., Izumi, S., Watanabe, Y., Pinner, R., & Davis, M. (2021). Soft CLIL and English language teaching: Understanding Japanese policy, practice and implications. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429032332

Jendrych, E. (2013). Developments in ESP teaching. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 34(1), 43-58. https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2013-0022

King, N. (1994). The qualitative research interview. In Cassell, C., & Symon, G. Qualitative methods in organizational research: A practical guide (pp. 14-36).

SAGE Publications Ltd.

Kemmis, S., & Mahon, K. (2017). Practice architectures of university education. In P. Grootenboer, C. Edwards-Groves, & S. Choy (Eds.), Practice theory perspectives on pedagogy and education: Praxis, diversity and contestation (pp. 107-141). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3130-4_6

Knight, P. and Trowler, P. R. (2000). Departmental leadership in higher education. Society for Research into Higher Education: Open University.

Kim, H. K., & Lee, S. (2020). Multiple Roles of Language Teachers in Supporting CLIL. English Teaching & Learning, 44(2), 109-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-020-00050-6

Lasagabaster, D., & Doiz, A. (2017). A longitudinal study on the impact of CLIL on affective factors. Applied Linguistics, 38, 688-712.

Levine, A. (1980). Why innovation fails. State University of New York Press.

Lisewski, B. (2018). An examination of how tutor-practitioners conceptualize and enact practice-based-knowing in a small Higher Education fashion School: A social practice theory approach, [Doctoral dissertation, Lancaster University], Ethos e-these online service. https://ethos.bl.uk/­OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.762477

McArdle, & Coutts, N. (2003). A strong core of qualities-a model of the professional educator that moves beyond reflection. Studies in Continuing Education, 25(2), 225-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037032000131547

MEXT. (2017). スーパーグローバル大学創成支援事業 (su-pa- guro-baru daigaku sousei shien jigyou [Top Global University project]). Tokyo. http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/koutou/kaikaku/sekaitenkai/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2017/05/11/1360288_03.pdf

Nicolini, P. (2012). Practice theory, work, and organization: An introduction. ­Oxford University Press.

San Isidro, X., & Lasagabaster, D. (2020). Lessons to be learned: A professional development approach to curriculum planning in a multilingual school in Galicia. In Bower, K., Chambers, G., Coyle, D., & R. Cross (Eds.), Curriculum integrated language teaching: CLIL in practice (pp. 145-164). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108687867.010

San Isidro, X. (2024). CLIL as a pathway for cross-curricular and translingual classroom practices: A comparative quantitative study on Scottish and Spanish teachers’ views. Language Teaching Research, 28(4), 1656-1681. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211032431

Schiro, M. S. (2013). Curriculum theory: Conflicting visions and enduring concerns. Thousand Oaks.

Suh, Y. D. (2005). Appointing able foreign nationals to Japanese universities: Towards increased internationalization. Daigakuronshuu, 35, 293-310.

Trowler, P. (1997). Beyond the Robbins trap: Reconceptualising academic responses to change in higher education (or … quiet flows the don?). Studies in Higher Education, 22:3, 301-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079712331380916

Trowler, P. (2020). Accomplishing change in teaching and learning regimes higher education and the practice sensibility. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198851714.001.0001

Trowler, P. (2022). Doctoral supervision: sharpening the focus of the ­practice lens. Higher Education Research and Development, 41(5), pp. 1743-1756. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1937955

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). SAGE Publications Ltd.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-10

How to Cite

Belobrovy, A. (2025). CLIL Curriculum Implementation in Higher Education: Constructing Processes of CLIL Teacher Identity. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 16(1), e1612. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2023.16.1.2

Issue

Section

Articles