Extrapolating from an Inquiry into Curricular Issues Concerning the Adoption of English as Medium of Instruction in a Japanese University Situation

Authors

  • Glenn Toh Author Tamagawa University Center for English as a Lingua Franca

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5294/5474

Keywords:

Academic content, medium of instruction, ideology, policy.

Abstract

Japanese universities have lately begun to teach academic content in Englishinstead of Japanese. In this article, I examine curricular and ideological issuesrelated to having English as a medium of instruction (EMI) at a Japanese universitybefore examining their links to larger cultural-political forces in Japan, includingneoconservative agendas. My discussion is framed within the settingof a Japanese higher education facing the challenges of: (1) low enrolments andinstitutional solvency; (2) curricular reform in keeping with the need for institutionalrenewal. Specifically, based on a critical narrative inquiry into a workplaceencounter involving two university courses, one in introductory psychologyand another in English for Academic Purposes (EAP), I will explore the ideologically-embedded nature of discourses affecting professional understandings oflanguage, meaning making and curriculum. I will also observe that the ‘changes’resulting from the adoption of EMI are only superficial and that the role andstatus of English, in reality, remains circumscribed.

doi:10.5294/laclil.2016.9.1.9

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Glenn Toh, Tamagawa University Center for English as a Lingua Franca

Glenn Toh has taught English as a Second Language, English for Specific Purposes and English for Academic Purposes as well as lectured on teacher training courses in Australia, New Zealand, Hong Kong, Thailand, Laos, Japan and Singapore. He is interested in issues relating to language, ideology and power.

References

Alderson, J. (2009). The micropolitics of research and publication. In J. Alderson (Ed.), The politics of language education: Individuals and institutions (pp. 222-236). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Barton, D. (2007). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Malden: Blackwell.

Befu, H. (2001). Hegemony of homogeneity. Melbourne: Transpacific.

Benesch, S. (1996). Needs analysis and curriculum development in EAP: an example of a critical approach. TESOL Quarterly, 30(4), 723-738.

Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for Academic Purposes: theory, politics and practice. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Birmingham, L. (2012). Learning curve: With a push, Japan’s universities go global. Time World Online, September 17, 2012. Retrieved September 7, 2014 from http://world.time.com/2012/09/17/learning-curve-with-a-push-japans-universities-go-global/.

Burgess, C. (2010). Higher education: Opening up or closing in? Contradictory reform goals could scotch chances of success. The Japan Times, March 23, 2010. Retrieved October 15, 2013 from

http://www.japantimes.co.jp/community/2010/03/23/issues/higher-education-opening-up-or-closing-in/#.Uy1xtdiKA1I.

Caprio, M., & Sugita, Y. (2007). The US occupation of Japan: innovation, continuity and compromise. In M. Caprio & Y. Sugita (Eds.), Democracy in occupied Japan: the US occupation and Japanese politics and society (pp. 1-25). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

Cumming, A. (2003). Experienced ESL/EFL writing instructors’ conceptualization of their teaching: Curriculum options and implications. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 71-92). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Dower, J. (1999). Embracing defeat: Japan in the wake of World War II. New York: W. W. Norton.

Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: an introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 3-65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Edwards, R., & Usher, R. (2008). Globalisation and pedagogy: Space, place and identity, 2nd Edition. London: Routledge.

Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and Power. London: Longman.

Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed, 30th anniversary edition. New York: Continuum.

Gee, J. (2000). The New Literacy Studies: from ‘socially situated’ to the work of the social. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton & R. Ivanic (Eds.), Situated Literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 180-196). London: Routledge.

Giri, R., & Foo, J. (2014). On teaching EIL in a Japanese context: the power within and power without. In R. Marlina & R. Giri (Eds.), The pedagogy of English as an international language (pp. 239-256). Heidelberg: Springer.

Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606-633.

Gray, A. (2002). Research practice for cultural studies: Ethnographic methods and lived cultures. London: Sage.

Hall, I. (1998). Cartels of the mind: Japan’s intellectual closed shop. New York: W. W. Norton.

Hashimoto, K. (2007). Japan’s language policy and the ‘Lost Decade’. In A. Tsui & J. Tollefson (Eds.), Language policy, culture, and identity in Asian contexts (pp. 25-36). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hayes, D. (2010). Duty and service: life and career of a Tamil teacher of English in Sri Lanka. TESOL Quarterly, 44(1), 58-83.

Heinrich, P. (2012). The making of monolingual Japan: Language ideology and Japanese modernity. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Hino, N. (2009). The teaching of English as an international language. AILA Review 22, 103-119.

Jenkins, J. (2014). English as a lingua franca in the international university: the politics of academic English language policy. London: Routledge.

Kubota, R. (2011). The politics of school curriculum and assessment in Japan. In Y. Zhao, J. Lei, G. Li, M. He, K. Okano, D. Gamage, H. Ramanathan & N. Magahed (Eds.), Handbook of Asian education: a cultural perspective (pp. 241-230). New York: Routledge.

Kubota, R., & Fujimoto, D. (2013). Racialized native speakers: voices of Japanese-American English language professionals. In S. Houghton & D. Rivers (Eds). Native-speakerism in Japan: Intergroup dynamics in foreign language education (pp. 75-91). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Land, R., & Whitley, C. (1998). Evaluating Second Language essays in regular composition classes: Towards a pluralistic U.S. rhetoric. In V. Zamel & R. Spack (Eds.), Negotiating Academic Literacies: Teaching and learning across languages and cultures (pp. 135-144). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Lea, M., & Street, B. (2000). Student writing and staff feedback in higher education: An academic literacies approach. In M. Lea and B. Stierer (Eds.), Student writing in higher education (pp. 32-46). Buckingham: Open University.

Lillis, T. (2003). Student writing as academic literacies: Drawing from Bakhtin to move from critique to design. Language and Education, 17(3), 192-207.

Lillis, T., & Turner, J. (2001). Student writing in higher education: contemporary confusion, traditional concerns. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(11), 57-68.

Lin, A., & Luk, J. (2005). Local creativity in the face of global domination: Insights of Bakhtin for teaching English for dialogic communication. In J. Hall, G. Vitanova & L. Marchenkova (Eds.), Dialogue with Bakhtin on second and foreign language learning: New perspectives (pp. 77-98). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Masutani, M. (2013). Japan Inc. supports education measures. The Japan Times, September 2, 2013, B2-B6. Retrieved September 7, 2014 from http://info.japantimes.co.jp/ads/pdf/20130902_global_30_universities.pdf.

McVeigh, B. (2000). Education reform in Japan: fixing education or fostering economic nation-statism? In J. Eades, T. Gill, & H. Befu (Eds.), Globalization and social change in contemporary Japan (pp. 76-92). Melbourne: Transpacific.

McVeigh, B. (2002). Japanese higher education as myth. New York: Sharpe.

McVeigh, B. (2006). The state bearing gifts: Deception and disaffection in Japanese higher education. Lanham: Lexington.

Murphey, T. (2004). Participation, (Dis-)Identification, and Japanese university entrance exams. TESOL Quarterly 38(4), 700-710.

Peters, M., & Roberts, P. (2012). The virtues of openness: Education, science and scholarship in a digital age. Boulders: Paradigm.

Rivers, D. (2010). Ideologies of internationalization and the treatment of diversity within Japanese higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(5), 442-454.

Rivers, D. (2013). Institutionalized native-speakerism: Voices of dissent and acts of resistance. In S. Houghton & D. Rivers (Eds.), Native-speakerism in Japan: Intergroup dynamics in foreign language education (pp. 75-91). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Scott, M., & Turner, J. (2004). Creativity, conformity, and complexity in acadmic writing: Tensions at the interface. In M. Baynham, A. Deignan & G. White (Eds.), Applied linguistics at the interface (pp. 145-155). London: Equinox.

Spack, R. (1998). The (in)visibility of the person(al) in academe. In V. Zamel & R. Spack (Eds.), Negotiating academic literacies: Teaching and learning across languages and cultures (pp. 293-316). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Stewart, T. (2001). Raising the status of ESP educators through integrated team teaching. AJELT, 11, 45-67.

Street, B. (1999). Academic literacies. In C. Jones, J. Turner & B. Street (eds) Students writing at the university: Cultural and epistemological issues (pp. 193-199). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Sugimoto, Y. (2010). An introduction to Japanese society. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

Thompson, J. (1987). Language and ideology: A framework for analysis. Sociological Review, 35(3), 516-536.

Yamagami, M., & Tollefson, J. (2011). Elite discourses of globalization in Japan: the role of English. In P. Seargeant (Ed.), English in Japan in the era of globalization, (pp. 15-37). New York: Macmillan.

Zamel, V. (1998a). Questioning academic discourse. In V. Zamel & R. Spack (Eds.), Negotiating academic literacies: Teaching and learning across languages and cultures, (pp. 187-197). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Zamel, V. (1998b). Strangers in academia: the experience of faculty and ESL students across the curriculum. In V. Zamel & R. Spack (Eds.), Negotiating academic literacies: teaching and learning across languages and cultures (pp. 249-264). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Downloads

Published

2016-06-11

How to Cite

Toh, G. (2016). Extrapolating from an Inquiry into Curricular Issues Concerning the Adoption of English as Medium of Instruction in a Japanese University Situation. Latin American Journal of Content &Amp; Language Integrated Learning, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.5294/5474

Issue

Section

Articles