CLIL across the Curriculum, benefits that go beyond the classroom


  • Jermaine S. McDougald Author Universidad de La Sabana


CLIL, Curriculum, CBI, Content Based Curriculum, HOTS, LOTS, CALP, BICS


Download data is not yet available.


Alcaraz-Mármol, G. (2018). Trained and non-trained language teachers on CLIL methodology: teachers’ facts and opinions about the CLIL approach in the primary education context in Spain. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 11(1), 39-64. doi: 10.5294/laclil.2018.11.1.3

Anderson, C. E. (2011). CLIL for CALP in the multilingual, pluricultural, globalized knowledge society: Experiences and backgrounds to L2 English usage among Latin American L1 Spanish-users. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 4(2), 51–66. doi: 10.5294/laclil.2011.4.2.5

Argudo, J., Abad, M., Fajardo-Dack, T., & Cabrera, P. (2018). Analyzing a pre-service EFL program through the lenses of the CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) approach at Universidad de Cuenca, Ecuador. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 11(1), 65-86. doi: 10.5294/laclil.2018.11.1.4

Bellés-Calvera, L. (2018). Teaching Music in English: A Content-Based Instruction Model in Secondary Education. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 11(1), 109-139. doi: 10.5294/ laclil.2018.11.1.6

Cenoz, J. (2015). Content-based instruction and content and language integrated learning: the same or different? Language, Culture and Curriculum. doi: 10.1080/07908318.2014.1000922

Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cummins, J. (1989). Theoretical Background. TESOL Quarterly Article Stable URL. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-27526-5_2

Cummins, J. (2000). Language Proficiency in Academic Contexts Evolution of the Conversational/Academic Language Proficiency Distinction. In Language, Power, and Pedagogy.

Deyrich, M.-C., & Stunnel, K. (2014). Language education models: New issues and challenges. In English as a foreign language teacher education: Current perspectives and challenges (p. 364).

Görlach, M. (1999). David Graddol, The Future of English? A Guide to Forecasting the Popularity of the English Language in the 21st Century I>. English World-Wide. 10.1075/eww.20.1.11gor

Graham, K. M., Choi, Y., Davoodi, A., Shakiba, R., & Dixon, L. Q. (2018). Language and content outcomes of CLIL and EMI: a systematic review. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 11(1), 19-37. doi: 10.5294/laclil.2018.11.1.2

Granados, J. (2018). The Challenges of Higher Education in the 21st Century. Retrieved September 1, 2018, from articles/challenges-higher-education-21st-century

Halbach, A. (2012). Questions about basic interpersonal communication skills and cognitive language proficiency. Applied Linguistics. doi: 10.1093/applin/ams058

Jarson, J. (2010). Information literacy and higher education: A toolkit for curricular integration. College & Research Libraries News, 71(10), 534–538.

Khatib, M., & Taie, M. (2016). BICS and CALP: Implications for SLA. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(2), 382. doi: 10.17507/jltr.0702.19

Meyer, O., Coyle, D., Halbach, A., Schuck, K., & Ting, T. (2015). A pluriliteracies approach to content and language integrated learning- Mapping learner progressions in knowledge construction and meaning-making. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1). doi: 10.1080/07908318.2014.1000924

Pinner, R. (2013). Authenticity and CLIL: Examining Authenticity from an International CLIL Perspective. International CLIL Research Journal.

Popović, D. (2014). Guest editor´s introduction: The challenges students are facing in the 21st century. Singidunum Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 1–4.

Reitbauer, M., Fürstenberg, U., Kletzenbauer, P., & Marko, K. (2018). Towards a cognitive-linguistic turn in CLIL: unfolding integration. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 11(1), 87-107. doi: 10.5294/laclil.2018.11.1.5

Robinson, K. (2001). Mind the gap: The creative conundrum. Critical Quarterly, 43(1), 41–45. doi: 10.1111/1467-8705.00335

Robinson, K. (2011). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative (2nd ed.). Chichester, UK: Capstone/John Wiley & Sons. Retrieved from http://www.

Robinson, K., & Aronica, L. (2009). The element: How finding your passion changes everything. London, UK: Allen Lane.

Robinson, K., Minkin, L., & Bolton, E. (1999). All Our Futures : Creativity , Culture and Education. National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education. doi: 10.1075/prag.22.3.02gre

Sarasa, M. C., & Porta, L. G. (2018). Narratives of desire, love, imagination, and fluidity: becoming an English teacher in a university preparation program. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 11(11), 141-163. doi: 10.5294/laclil.2018.11.1.7

UNESCO. (2018). Internacional Bureau of Education. Available from http://

Várkuti, A. (2010). Linguistic Benefits of the CLIL Approach: Measuring Linguistic Competences. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(3), 67-79. Available from

Vázquez, V. P., & Gaustad, M. (2013). Designing Bilingual Programmes for Higher Education in Spain : Organisational , Curricular and Methodological Decisions, 2(1), 82–94.




How to Cite

McDougald, J. S. (2018). CLIL across the Curriculum, benefits that go beyond the classroom. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 11(1). Retrieved from




Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.