Teacher Professional Development in Language-Driven CLIL: A Case Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2019.12.2.3Keywords:
Language-driven CLIL, professional development, career development, authenticity, collaboration, structured learning, beliefsAbstract
El desarrollo profesional para AICLE enfocado en la lengua: un estudio de caso
O desenvolvimento profissional no CLIL com foco no idioma: Um estudo de caso
Teacher Professional Development in Language-Driven CLIL: A Case Study
The professional development of and language integrated learning (CLIL) continues to be a niche in the language education literature, particularly in Latin America. The aim of this study is to explore the effects of a continuing professional development course delivered in 2018 to support language-driven CLIL implementation in state secondary schools in Argentina. Built as a case study, the investigation draws on data from one teacher collected through multiple sources for triangulation purposes. Two research questions guided the study: 1) What beliefs does a teacher have of language-driven CLIL? and 2) What are the effects of a continuing professional development course on language-driven CLIL targeted at EFL secondary school teachers? Findings show that authenticity, rather than language-content integration, is a salient feature of language-driven CLIL in this teacher’s practice. Findings also reveal that CLIL success depends on learners’ English language proficiency. Drawing on its teacher’s beliefs of CLIL, the course had an impact on the teacher’s identity as a materials developer and autonomous and critical practitioner who could theorize by reflecting on her practices and the readings provided by the course tutor.
To reference this article (APA) / Para citar este artículo (APA) / Para citar este artigo (APA)
Banegas, D. L. (2019). Teacher professional development in language-driven CLIL: A case study. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 12(2), 242-264. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2019.12.2.3
Received: 05/02/2019
Approved: 23/04/2019
Published: 11/05/2020
Downloads
References
Argudo, J., Abad, M., Fajardo-Dack, T., & Cabrera, P. (2018). Analyzing a pre-service EFL program through the lenses of the CLIL approach at the University of Cuenca-Ecuador. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 11(1), 65–86. http://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2018.11.1.4
Avidov-Ungar, O. (2016). A model of professional development: Teachers’ perceptions of their professional development. Teachers and Teaching, 22(6), 653–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1158955
Ball, P., Kelly, K., & Clegg, J. (2015). Putting CLIL into practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Banegas, D. L. (2013). The integration of content and language as a driving force in the EFL lesson. In E. Ushioda (Ed.), International perspectives on motivation: Language learning and professional challenges (pp. 82–97). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Banegas, D. L. (2016). Teachers develop CLIL materials in Argentina: A workshop experience. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 9(1), 17–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2016.9.1.2
Banegas, D. L. (2017). Teacher-developed materials for CLIL: Frameworks, sources, and activities. Asian EFL Journal, 19(3), 31–48. Retrieved from https://www.elejournals.com/asian-efl-journal/the-asian-efl-journal-quarterly-september-2017/
Banegas, D. L. (2018). Learning subject-specific content through ESP in a Geography teaching programme: An action research story in Argentina. English for Specific Purposes, 50(1), 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.11.001
Banegas, D. L. (2020). (Ed.). Content knowledge in English language teacher education: International insights. London, UK/New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
Banegas, D. L., Poole, P., & Wade-Corrales, K. (in press). Latin American in CLIL: A critical review. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching.
Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education. London, UK: Continuum.
Cirocki, A., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2017). Reflective practice for professional development of TESOL practitioners. European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 6(2), 5–24.
Coral, J., Lleixà, T., & Ventura, C. (2018). Foreign language competence and content and language integrated learning in multilingual schools in Catalonia: An ex post facto study analysing the results of state key competences testing. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(2), 139–150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2016.1143445
Coyle, D., Hood, D., & Marsh, D. (2010). Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
Darwin, S., & Barahona, M. (2019). Can an outsider become an insider? Analysing the effect of action research in initial EFL teacher education programs. Educational Action Research, 27(5), 709–725. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2018.1494616
de Vries, S., Jansen, E., & van de Grift, J. (2013). Profiling teachers’ continuing professional development and the relation with their beliefs about learning and teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 33(1), 78–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.02.006
Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2014). CLIL and motivation: The effect of individual and contextual variables. Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 209–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.889508
Esteban-Guitart, M. (2014). Funds of identity. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology (pp. 752–757). New York, NY: Springer.
Garzón-Díaz, E. (2018). From cultural awareness to scientific citizenship: Implementing content and language integrated learning projects to connect environmental science and English in a state school in Colombia. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1456512
Hawker, S., & Kerr, C. (2016). Doing grounded theory. In E. Lyons & A. Coyle (Eds.), Analysing qualitative data in psychology (pp. 147–159). London, UK/Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hillyard, S. (2011). First steps in CLIL: Training the teachers. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 4(2), 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2011.4.2.1
Ioannou Georgiou, S. (2012). Reviewing the puzzle of CLIL. ELT Journal, 66(4), 495–504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccs047
Johnson, K. E. (2009). Second language teacher education: A sociocultural perspective. London, UK/New York, NY: Routledge.
Keogh, C. (2017). Using WhatsApp to create a space of language and content for students of international relations. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 10(1), 75–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2017.10.1.4
Llinares, A., & Morton, T. (Eds.). (2017). Applied linguistics perspectives on CLIL. Amsterdam, The Netherlands/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Mahan, R., Brevik, L. M., & Ødegaard, M. (2018). Characterizing CLIL teaching: New insights from a lower secondary classroom. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1472206
Martínez-Agudo, J. (2019). Which instructional programme (EFL or CLIL) results in better oral communicative competence? Updated empirical evidence from a monolingual context. Linguistics and Education, 51(1), 69–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.04.008
McDougald, J. (2015). Teachers’ attitudes, perceptions and experiences in CLIL: A look at content and language. Colombian Applied Linguistic Journal, 17(1), 25–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.calj.2015.1.a02
Merino, J. A., & Lasagabaster, D. (2018). CLIL as a way to multilingualism. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(1), 79–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1128386
Navarro-Pablo, M., & García-Jiménez, E. (2018). Are CLIL students more motivated? An analysis of affective factors and their relation to language attainment. Porta Linguarum, 29, 71–90. Retrieved from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6273211
Payne, S. (2016). Grounded theory. In E. Lyons & A. Coyle (Eds.), Analysing qualitative data in psychology (pp. 119–146). London, UK/Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pérez-Cañado, M. L. (2018a). CLIL and pedagogical innovation: Fact or fiction? International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12208
Pérez-Cañado, M. L. (2018b). Introduction. Porta Linguarum, 29, 5–7.
Pérez-Cañado, M. L. (2018c). Innovations and challenges in CLIL teacher training. Theory into Practice, 57(3), 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2018.1492238
Pimentel-Siqueira, D. S., Landau, J., & Albuquerque Paraná, R. (2018). Innovations and challenges in CLIL implementation in South America. Theory into Practice, 57(3), 196–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2018.1484033
Pinner, R. S. (2013). Authenticity and CLIL: Examining authenticity from an international CLIL perspective. International CLIL Research Journal, 2(1), 44–54.
Pinner, R. S. (2019). Authenticity and teacher-student motivational synergy: A narrative of language teaching. London, UK/New York, NY: Routledge.
Pistorio, M. I. (2009). Teacher training and competences for effective CLIL teaching in Argentina. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 2(2), 37–43. Retrieved from https://laclil.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/LACLIL/article/view/2605
Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (2003). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London, UK/New York, NY: Sage.
San Isidro, X. (2018). Innovations and challenges in CLIL implementation in Europe. Theory into Practice, 57(3), 185–195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2018.1484038
Walsh, S., & Mann, S. (Eds.). (2019). The Routledge handbook of English language teacher education. London, UK/New York, NY: Routledge.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This Journal and its articles are published under the Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 DEED Attribution 4.0 International license. You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The license cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the terms of the license.