A Corpus-Based Analysis of Bilingual Learners’ Moral Judgments: Challenging the Notion of ‘Two Souls in a Bilingual Mind’

Wenhsien Yang; David Goodman; Li-zu Yang

doi:10.5294/laclil.2026.19.1.4

Autores/as

Wenhsien Yang Autor/a National Kaohsiung University of Hospitality and Tourism https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3762-3696
David Goodman Autor/a National Kaohsiung University of Hospitality and Tourism https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9361-2724
Li-zu Yang Autor/a National Pingtung University of Science and Technology https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6465-5976

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2026.19.1.4

Palabras clave:

educación bilingüe, juicios morales, sistema cognitivo, producción verbal, educación superior

Resumen

Este estudio proporciona pruebas empíricas que cuestionan la noción de que el bilingüismo fomenta sistemas cognitivos separados. Al demostrar que los estudiantes bilingües muestran flexibilidad en lugar de división cognitiva en los juicios morales entre idiomas, la investigación contribuye a la comprensión de los procesos cognitivos bilingües y ofrece implicaciones pedagógicas para la educación bilingüe. En el marco de la política de educación bilingüe de Taiwán, este estudio de métodos mixtos investiga el razonamiento moral entre los estudiantes universitarios bilingües mediante entrevistas estructuradas tanto en L1 (chino mandarín) como en L2 (inglés). Los análisis detallados, que incluyen análisis léxico y de sentimientos, no revelan diferencias estadísticamente significativas en el juicio moral entre idiomas, aunque se observaron diferencias sutiles en la riqueza léxica, la expresión de sentimientos y las estrategias de razonamiento. Estos hallazgos enfatizan la necesidad de andamiaje, enseñanza culturalmente sensible y técnicas de interrogatorio estratégicas para mejorar la participación cognitiva y lingüística de los alumnos en entornos de Enseñanza a través del inglés (EMI, por sus siglas en inglés). El estudio subraya la importancia de la flexibilidad y la adaptabilidad en la educación bilingüe, desafiando el escepticismo de “dos almas en una mente bilingüe”.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Al-Amri, M. N. (2013). Effects of bilingualism on personality, cognitive and educational developments: A historical perspective. American Academic & Scholarly Research Journal, 5(1), 1-7. https://aasrc.org/aasrj/index.php/aasrj/article/view/668

Bartels, D. M. (2008, August). Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making. Cognition, 108(2), 381-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.001

Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I., & Luk, G. (2012). Bilingualism: Consequences for mind and brain. Trends in cognitive sciences, 16(4), 240-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.03.001

Björklund, F. (2000). Moral cognition: individual differences, intuition and reasoning in moral judgment. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Lund University, Sweden.

Cadierno, T. (2017). Thinking for speaking about motion in a second language. Motion and space across languages: Theory and applications, 279-300. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.59.12cad

Chou, M. H. (2018). Speaking anxiety and strategy use for learning English as a foreign, language in full and partial English‐medium instruction contexts. TESOL Quarterly, 52(3), 611-633. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.455

Culpeper, J. (2009). Keyness: Words, parts-of-speech and semantic categories in the character-talk of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(1), 29-59. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.14.1.03cul

Cummins, D. D., & Cummins, R. C. (2012). Emotion and deliberative reasoning in moral judgment. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 328. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00328

Doiz, A., & Lasagabaster, D. (2023). An analysis of the type of questions posed by teachers in English-medium instruction at university level. Education Sciences, 13(1), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010082

Donnelly, S., Brooks, P. J., & Homer, B. D. (2019). Is there a bilingual advantage on interference-control tasks? A multiverse meta-analysis of global reaction time and interference cost. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 26, 1122-1147. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01567-z

D’Souza, D., Brady, D., Haensel, J. X., & D’Souza, H. (2021). Early bilingual experience is associated with change detection ability in adults. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 2068. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81545-5

Filipovic, L. (2018). Speaking in a second language but thinking in the first language: Language-specific effects on memory for causation events in English and Spanish. International Journal of Bilingualism, 22(2), 180-198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006916661636

Filipovic, L., & Hawkins, J. A. (2019). The Complex Adaptive System Principles model for bilingualism: Language interactions within and across bilingual minds. International Journal of Bilingualism, 23(6), 1223-1248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006918781076

Fan, S.H. (2020). Rethinking bilingual education. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 9(10), 88-91.

Gell-Mann, M. (1994, March). Complex adaptive systems. In Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity-Proceedings (Vol. 19, pp. 17-17). Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.

Haidt, J. (2003). The moral emotions. Handbook of affective sciences, 11(2003), 852-870. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195126013.003.0045

Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2008). Language integration in bilingual sentence production. Acta psychologica, 128(3), 479-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.08.005

Helzer, E. G., Fleeson, W., Furr, R. M., Meindl, P., & Barranti, M. (2017). Once a utilitarian, consistently a utilitarian? Examining principledness in moral judgment via the robustness of individual differences. Journal of Personality, 85(4), 505-517. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12256

Her, O. S. (2021). 2030 Bilingual nation: Which two languages and whose nation? https://opinion.cw.com.tw/blog/profile/351/article/10793

Her, O. S. (2022a). What are the strategic targets of the 2030 Bilingual policy? https://opinion.cw.com.tw/blog/profile/351/article/13006

Her, O. S. (2023). A stairway to heaven? Social attitudes and English language policies in Taiwan. In the Proceedings of 2023 International Conference & Workshop on TEFL & Applied Linguistics, (pp. 2). Ming-chuan University.

Hohenstein, J., Eisenberg, A., & Naigles, L. (2006). Is he floating across or crossing afloat? Cross-influence of L1 and L2 in Spanish–English bilingual adults. Bilingualism: Language and cognition, 9(3), 249-261. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728906002616

Hwang, K. K. (2012). Foundations of Chinese Psychology: Confucian Social Relations. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1439-1

Hyltenstam, K., & Österberg, R. (2010). Foreign language provision at secondary level in Sweden. Sociolinguistica, 24. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110223323.85

Jensen, L. A. (2008). Through two lenses: A cultural–developmental approach to moral psychology. Developmental Review, 28(3), 289-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2007.11.001

Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford University Press.

Koster, D., & Cadierno, T. (2019). The effect of language on recognition memory in first language and second language speakers: The case of placement events. International Journal of Bilingualism, 23(2), 651-669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006918763140

Lasagabaster, D. (2023). The use of questions in English-medium university courses: Current practices and future challenges. A keynote speech delivered at Language Issues on EMI, 22-23 April, 2023. National Taiwan Normal University.

Lasagabaster, D., & Doiz, A. (2022). Classroom interaction in English-medium instruction: Are there differences between disciplines? Language, Culture and Curriculum, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2022.2151615

Lee, K., Cameron, C. A., Xu, F., And, G. F., & Board, J. (1997). Chinese and Canadian Children’s Evaluations of Lying and Truth Telling: Similarities and Differences in the Context of pro‐and Antisocial Behaviors. Child development, 68(5), 924-934. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb01971.x

Liao, H. H. (2022). Lose-lose: Bilingual state policy weakens creativity. In H. H. Liao (Eds.) The Fantasy of Bilingual Nation (pp. 79-120). National Taiwan University Press.

Lin, Z. B. (2020). The Future of Bilingual Education in Taiwan: The Construction of a Local Model. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 9(10), 8-13.

Macaro, E. (2015). English medium instruction: time to start asking some difficult questions. Modern English Teacher, 24(2), 4-8.

Oliveira, M., Bitencourt, C., Teixeira, E., & Santos, A. C. (2013, July 4-5). Thematic content analysis: Is there a difference between the support provided by the MAXQDA® and NVivo® software packages. In Ramos, I. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Research Methods for Business and Management Studies (pp. 304-314). Academic Conferences Ltd.

Pavlenko, A. (2011). Thinking and speaking in two languages: Overview of the field. Thinking and speaking in two languages, 237-257. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847693389-010

Pavlenko, A. (2014). The bilingual mind: And what it tells us about language and thought. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139021456

Pérez Cañado, M. L. (2020). Implementing bilingual education in monolingual contexts: lessons learned and ways forward. The Language Learning Journal, 48(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2020.1695622

Rawls, J. (2009). A theory of justice. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.

Sachdeva, S., Singh, P., & Medin, D. (2011). Culture and the quest for universal principles in moral reasoning. International Journal of Psychology, 46(3), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2011.568486

Sanches de Oliveira, G., & Bullock Oliveira, M. (2022). Bilingualism is always cognitively advantageous, but this doesn’t mean what you think it means. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 867166. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.867166

Scott, S. (1973). The relation of divergent thinking to bilingualism: Cause or effect. Unpublished research project, McGill University.

Scott, M. (2018). Wordsmith Tools. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software. https://lexically.net/publications/citing_wordsmith.htm

Shweder, R. A. (1982). Beyond self-constructed knowledge: The study of culture and morality. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly (1982-), 41-69.

Slobin, D. I. (2003). Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4117.003.0013

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1997). Grounded theory in practice. Sage.

Tao, L., Wang, G., Zhu, M., & Cai, Q. (2021). Bilingualism and domain-general cognitive functions from a neural perspective: A systematic review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 125, 264-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.02.029

Traxler, M. J., & Tooley, K. M. (2012). Lexical and syntactic priming in language comprehension. Psychology of priming, 79-100.

Ure, J. (1971). Lexical density and register differentiation. Applications of linguistics, 27, 443-52.

VERBI Software. (2021). MAXQDA 2022 [computer software]. Available from maxqda.com.

Yang, W., & Yang, L. (2026). A corpus analysis of teacher-led English questions in Taiwan secondary CLIL classrooms. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 23(1): 1-25. http://doi.org/10.30397/TJTESOL.202604_23(1).0004

Zhu, S. (2023). The gender and cultural differences in moral choices under the trolly dilemma and the footbridge dilemma. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 8, 738-743. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v8i.4343