Componentes SIOP : Aplicación y evaluación a través de ABP en un aula universitaria de contenido y lengua

Autores/as

  • Luisa Cecilia Chavez Autor/a Institución Universitaria Colombo Americana, ÚNICA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2013.6.1.3

Palabras clave:

aplicación, valoración, aprendizaje basado en proyectos, modelo de apoyo, SIOP (Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol)

Resumen

Este texto describe las circunstancias y resultados de una investigación de acción, la cual explora la efectividad de establecer explícitamente la correlaciónentre dos de ocho componentes del modelo SIOP (Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol,“ Protocolo de Observación de la Instrucción Contextualizada”): Aplicación y Valoración a través de ABP (Aprendizaje Basado en Proyectos) en el contexto de contenido-lengua a nivel universitario. Comienza sintetizando varias ideas de recientes teóricos, quienes ponderan la importancia de la aplicación en contextos reales, como medio para valorar los procesos de aprendizaje. La investigación se realizó en una universidad en Bogotá, Colombia durante el segundo semestre de 2011 y primero de 2012. El análisis de la data se obtuvo de un grupo de estudiantes de sexto semestre. Los resultados demuestran que el acompañamiento y uso apropiado del PBL, como instrumento de aplicación, llevan a los estudiantes a apropiarse y a valorar su proceso de aprendizaje.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Luisa Cecilia Chavez, Institución Universitaria Colombo Americana, ÚNICA

Luisa Cecilia Chávez holds an M.A. in Liberal Arts with a special focus on Applied Linguistics and Latin America Literature from Temple University (Philadelphia, PA, USA). She also has postgraduate degrees in Learning Disabilities from the Clínica de Foniatría y Logopedia (Madrid, Spain). She has done research in the area of Bilingual Education for five years as a member of the research group SIRP (SIOP Research Program) at the Institución Universitaria Colombo Americana ÚNICA (Bogotá, Colombia). She has taught for more than fifteen years at college level as well as at AP and IB schools in the USA and Spain. She is currently a full-time faculty member at ÚNICA, where she is the editor of the Bilingual Literature Magazine as well in charge of the students’ library as part of their self-access center. She has been an active participant in various international conferences, panels, and workshops regarding constructivist theories and their application to L2 content-language classrooms.

Citas

Barak, M., & Raz, E. (2000). Hot-air balloons: Project-centered study as a bridge between science and technology education. Science Education, 24(1), 27–42.

Brownlee, J., Purdie, N., & Boulton-Lewis, G. (2003). An investigation of students teachers’ knowledge about their own learning. Higher Education, 45(1), 109–125.

Buehl, D. (2001) Classroom strategies for interactive learning (2nd Ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

ChanLin, L.-J. (2008). Technology integration applied to project-based learning in science. Innovation in Education and Teaching International, 45(1), 55–65.

Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

Diaz-Lefebvre, R. (2006). Learning for understanding: A faculty-driven paradigm shift in learning, imaginative teaching, and creative assessment. Community College Journal of Research & Practice, 30(2), 135–137.

Doppelt, Y. (2003). Assessment of project-based learning in a mechatronics context. Journal of Technology Education, 16(2). Retrieved from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v16n2/doppelt.html

Doppelt, Y. (2003). Implementation and assessment of project-based learning in a flexible environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13(3), 255–272.

Echavarria, J., Short, D., & Vogt, M. (2008). Implementing SIOP Model through effective development and coaching. Boston, MA: Pearson.

Geeslin, K. L. (2003). Student self-assessment in the foreign language classroom: The place of authentic assessment instruments in the Spanish language classroom. Hispania, 86(4), 857–868.

Gülbahar, Y., & Tinmaz, H. (2006). Implementation project-based learning and E-portfolio assessment in an undergraduate course. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 309–327.

Krashen, S., & Terrell, T. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Alemany/Prentice Hall.

Lou, Y., & MacGregor, S. K. (2004). Enhancing project-based learning through online between-group collaboration. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10(4–6), 419–440. doi:10.1080/13803610512331383509

McLaughlin, M., & Vogt, M. (2000). Creativity and innovation in content area teaching: A resource for intermediate, middle, and high school teachers. Norwood, MA: Chirstopher-Gordon.

McLaughlin, M., & Kennedy, A. (1993). A classroom guide to performance-based assessment. Princeton, NJ: Houghton Mifflin.

Menken, K. (2000). What are the critical issues in wide-scale assessment of English language learners? Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED450595.pdf

Mills, G. E. (2007). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

Nunan, D. (1998). Second language teaching and learning. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.

O’Malley, J. J & Chamot, A. U. (1990) Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Short, D. J. (2006). Content teaching and learning and language. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd ed., vol. 3, pp. 101–105). Oxford, England: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00685-4

Stefanou, C., & Parkes, J. (2003). Effects of classroom assessment on student motivation in fifth-grade science. The Journal of Education, 96(3), 152–162.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45(4), 477–501.

Descargas

Publicado

2013-04-09

Cómo citar

Chavez, L. C. (2013). Componentes SIOP : Aplicación y evaluación a través de ABP en un aula universitaria de contenido y lengua. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 6(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2013.6.1.3

Número

Sección

Artículos